The Role of Inquiry in Writing a Researched Argument: What Greene Left Out

Stuart Greene, in his “Argument as Conversation, The Role of Inquiry in Writing a Researched Argument” implores his audience to consider the following when entering a conversation: what is the topic’s subject, relevance and importance, what kind of evidence can be further provided to prove one’s point, what prejudice or “objections” might the readers have, and lastly, what would be the broad-scale outcome if this argument evoked change?

Greene also encourages his reader to keep an open mind, react to a claim appropriately, and use our rhetorical tools to prove a claim. While this suggestion can be helpful, Greene’s error is obvious– he ignores, or rather, forgets that other writer’s too have rhetoric tools, and they use their devices, in many cases quite artfully, to convince their audience of the validity and importance of their claim. Readers of these claims should not be blinded by the author’s tools of persuasion; only after one strips away the rhetorical make-up of an claim can one see the true face of the argument. Considering the devices of persuasion the writer uses to convince the reader, therefore, is extremely important in the reader’s reaction to a piece.

The more a reader can see through the writer’s argument, the more appropriately the reader can shape their response. If the reader wishes to disclaim a position, then he can pick apart holes in the essay, removing all prior credibility of the claim. If the reader agrees with the writer, or wishes to qualify a claim, the reader can fill in the holes of the rhetor’s argument (without calling attention to the piece’s flaws) then build off that foundation.

About these ads
This entry was posted in Writing Composition. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to The Role of Inquiry in Writing a Researched Argument: What Greene Left Out

  1. vothmr says:

    I like the way that you pose the opposite side of the argument. You remind us that the reader also has an opinion on the situation and that he can use his rhetorical tools to eat away at the authors argument.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s